• March 9th, 2010 - Graham Partners LLP We’re changing our name but not our commitment to clients and community. Read More »
  • June 29th, 2009 - Bill 168 – Occupational Health and Safety Amendment Act Read More »
  • June 15th, 2009 - Ontario Businesses Regulated to Reduce Toxic Substance Use Read More »
  • June 9th, 2009 - Barrie Innisfil Border Dispute & the Rest of Simcoe County Read More »

190 Cundles Road East at
St. Vincent Street, Suite 107,
Barrie, Ontario L4M 4S5

Graham Partners LLP We’re changing our name but not our commitment to clients and community.

We’re changing our name but not our commitment to clients and community.  After 35 years providing service as Graham Wilson & Green, we are continuing our partnership as a limited liability partnership effective March 1, 2010.   Our new name is:

GRAHAM  PARTNERS  LLP

Our firm has been a proud cornerstone of the Barrie and Simcoe County community for decades and a contributor to every major capital project in the city over the last 35 years.  As we move forward under our new name, Graham Partners LLP will maintain its focus on business law and our clients’ personal legal needs.  We will continue our work with a varied cross section of private businesses, financial institutions, municipal corporations, public institutions and associations.  We also serve individuals and families with the purchase of their first home and assist them with planning for their estates. We will also maintain our renowned expertise in conflict resolutions, offering trained and experienced mediators to help resolve disputes in a wide variety of fields.

We have been proud donors to the hospital, the library, the Simcoe County Museum, the YMCA and countless other important community facilities.  Community service is in our blood. Our partners and staff have volunteered for a wide range of community organizations, including the Royal Victoria Hospital, the MacLaren Art Centre, Theatre by The Bay, and many minor sports groups. The firm and its individual members also serve various community charities and service clubs including, the Rotary Clubs of Barrie and Barrie-Kempenfelt, the YMCA, many other professional, civic and community organizations and several places of worship. We believe in serving the community that has made us a success.

Graham Partners LLP will carry on the practice of law as it always has, but with a degree of limited liability.  The partners in a limited liability partnership (LLP) are not personally liable for the negligent acts of another partner, or an employee who is directly supervised by another partner.  Each partner is personally liable for his or her own actions, and for the actions of those he or she directly supervises and controls.  The partnership itself continues to be liable for the negligence of its partners, associates and employees, and accordingly, there is no reduction or limitation on the liability of the partnership.  For this reason, all of the firm’s assets remain at risk, as before.  Liability insurance protection for the lawyers of the partnership continues, and minimum insurance requirements, as required by the Partnership Act, have been established for LLPs by the Law Society of Upper Canada.  The limitation on liability of individual partners is the only substantive change to the partnership.


New name, same commitment to clients and community.

 

190 Cundles Rd. East, Suite 107    Barrie, ON    L4M 4S5    Tel (705) 737-1811   Fax (705) 737-5390 www.grahampartners.ca

Bill 168 – Occupational Health and Safety Amendment Act

On April 20, 2009, the Ontario Government introduced Bill 168, the Occupational Health and Safety Amendment Act (Violence and Harassment in the Workplace) 2009. If passed, Bill 168 would amend the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) to impose new obligations on employers with respect to workplace violence and harassment. Before it becomes law, Bill 168 must pass second reading, third reading and receive Royal Assent.

Under Bill 168 in its current form, employers must devise workplace violence and harassment policies, develop programs to implement such policies and engage in assessments to measure the risk of workplace violence. In addition, work refusal rights and the duties of employers and supervisors under OHSA have both been clarified to specifically apply to workplace violence.

The main features of Bill 168 in its current form are summarized below:

Definitions of Workplace Violence and Harassment

Bill 168 defines “workplace violence” and “workplace harassment” as follows:

“Workplace harassment” means engaging in a course of vexatious comment or conduct against a worker in a workplace that is known or ought reasonably to be known to be unwelcome.“Workplace violence” means (a) the exercise of physical force by a person against a worker in a workplace that causes, or could cause, physical injury to the worker; and/or (b) an attempt to exercise physical force against a worker in a workplace that could cause physical injury to the worker.

What is notable about the definition of “workplace violence” is that it only deals with physical harm or injury. Bill 168 appears to be the Government’s response to Bill 29 – a private member’s bill introduced in December 2007 dealing with workplace violence and harassment. Unlike Bill 29, however, there is no reference to “psychological” harm or injury as a form of workplace violence.

The definition of “workplace harassment” is very broad. Unlike “harassment” as defined in the Human Rights Code, the definition of “workplace harassment” under Bill 168 may include conduct that is not related to a prohibited ground of discrimination, e.g., sex, age, ethnicity, religion, etc.

Workplace Violence and Harassment Policies

Bill 168 requires employers to prepare written policies dealing with workplace violence and harassment.Workers must be trained on these policies, which must be posted in workplaces with more than five workers and reviewed by the employer annually.

A Program to Implement the Policies

Under Bill 168, employers are required to develop and maintain a program to implement workplace

violence and harassment policies.

The workplace violence program must include measures and procedures to:

  • Control the risks identified in the workplace violence assessment;
  • Call for immediate assistance when workplace violence occurs or is likely to occur, or when a threat of workplace violence is made;
  • Report incidents or threats of workplace violence to the employer or supervisor; and
  • Establish how the employer investigates and manages incidents, complaints or threats of workplace violence.

The workplace harassment program must include procedures for reporting and investigating incidents of workplace harassment.

Workplace Violence Assessments

Bill 168 requires employers to assess the risk of workplace violence that may arise. In addition to taking into account its own workplace conditions, an employer’s assessments must also take into account the conditions of other similar workplaces.

The employer must advise the joint health and safety committee or the health and safety representative of the results of the assessment. If the assessment is in writing, a copy must be provided. If the workplace does not have a joint health and safety committee or a health and safety representative, the workers must be advised of the results of the assessments and of how to obtain a copy of the assessment (if the assessment is in writing).

Workplace Violence Reassessments

Bill 168 requires that employers reassess the workplace for workplace violence risks “as often as is necessary” to ensure the workplace violence policy and program protects workers.

Domestic Violence

Bill 168 has specifically addressed the issue of domestic violence in the workplace by requiring employers to “take every precaution reasonable in the circumstances” to protect workers from domestic violence that would likely cause physical injury to workers in the workplace. This obligation on the employer arises only if the employer is aware, or ought reasonably to be aware, of the situation.

What constitutes “domestic violence” is not defined.

Disclosure of Persons with a Violent History

One aspect of Bill 168 that may prove contentious is the obligation on employers and supervisors to

provide information, including personal information, to a worker about a person with “a history of violent behaviour” if:

  • The worker could be expected to encounter that person in the course of his/her work; and
  • There is a risk of workplace violence likely to expose the worker to physical injury

Bill 168 contains no guidance on who would be a person with a “history of violent behaviour.” However, it is interesting to note that the person must have a history of “violent” behaviour (and not necessarily “harassing” behaviour) in order for the disclosure obligation to be triggered. This is one area of Bill 168 that may be amended as it moves through the legislative process.

Work Refusals

Bill 168 clarifies that a worker may refuse to work where he/she has reason to believe that he/she is in danger of being a victim of workplace violence. The normal refusal process would be triggered (i.e., the employer would investigate the refusal, followed by a Ministry of Labour inspector if necessary).

Given the Ministry of Labour’s increased focus on workplace violence and harassment, and the fact that Bill 168 is a Government Bill, it would not be surprising if some version of Bill 168 passed into law.

We will update you as Bill 168 progresses through the Ontario Legislature.

To discuss your Employment or Labour Law concerns contact Doug MacLeod at 705-737-1811 ext.

251 or dlm@gwg.on.ca

Ontario Businesses Regulated to Reduce Toxic Substance Use

In April the Ontario government introduced Bill 167, the Toxics Reduction Act, 2009 which attempts to reduce the reliance on toxic substances in manufacturing, workplaces and consumer products in Ontario. This bill includes a framework for toxic substance reduction by facilities which will be set out in regulations.  Similar programs are in place in the United States and the European Union; however, Ontario will be the first province in Canada to attempt to reduce toxic substance use.

If this bill is adopted, facilities subject to the Bill will be required to track and report the toxic substances they use and develop a plan for reducing the use of those substances. This Bill would expand on the federal National Pollution Release Inventory (NPRI) to require a broad range of industrial facilities, starting with the manufacturing and mineral processing sectors, to track and quantify their use of 300 toxic substances, to develop a plan to reduce this use and to disclose a summary of the plan which will be available to the public. Those subject to the Bill will be required to report on their progress with implementing their plan to reduce use of the toxic substances while the implementation of the plan itself is voluntary. Ontario businesses will be subject to increased public scrutiny regarding their use of toxic substances due to the disclosure obligations under this Bill.

The intent of this legislation is to focus on the front-end use or input of toxic substances in processes rather then the traditional management of pollutants at the end of the cycle through management of emissions. Reduction of the use of toxic substances is expected to reduce levels of exposure to substances in air, land, water and consumer products.

Details regarding Bill 167, including the list of prescribed toxic substances and substances of concern as well as the facilities to be subject to this Bill and the timelines for reporting and planning will not be available until the regulations are drafted. It is expected that the requirements will be phased in over several years.

The comment period for this bill ended May 7, 2009. Further information about Bill 167 can be found at www.ebr.gov.on.ca

To discuss environmental law needs please contact Shari Elliott at 737-1811 ext 222 or

sde@gwg.on.ca

Shari Elliott

Barrie Innisfil Border Dispute & the Rest of Simcoe County

On June 4, the Province gave first reading to legislation to settle, at least for this decade, the boundary battle between Barrie and Innisfil.  The actual map can be obtained on any of the websites of Innisfil, Barrie or the County.  Generally, Barrie obtains the lands that were set aside, in 1981, as the “moratorium lands” and were supposed to be untouched by Barrie until 2012. Innisfil gets to keep its valuable Innisfil Heights industrial lands at the 400 Hwy and Innisfil Beach Road. The question of how these industrial lands will be serviced is still up in the air.

Perhaps more interesting than the drawing of the line which everyone except a few unlucky speculators had guessed, was what the settlement means to growth management generally in the Simcoe area. In the document “Simcoe Area: A Strategic Vision for Growth” (available on the Ontario Government Website), also released on June 4th, the Province has indicated its intentions to concentrate growth in certain specific centres in the Simcoe Area.

Previously, the County had undertaken a detailed growth management exercise. Barrie and Orillia were invited to attend. Orillia attended but Barrie declined. The working group set about determining how much of the provincially mandated growth (approximately 237,000 persons to the year 2031) would be allocated to each of the 18 municipalities.  In the face of a lack of co-operation by Barrie, the working group, which had set aside a 40,000 person buffer to discuss with Barrie, decided to simply divide that number between the other 17 municipalities.

In the “vision paper”, the Province has now stepped in and determined how that 40,000 population number will be split. Barrie will be given 13,000 for a projected 2031 population of 227,000 people. The remainder of the 40,000 will be divided between Orillia, Bradford West Gwillimbury (largely to be added to the “Bradford Urban Area”), New Tecumseth (largely to be added to the “Alliston Urban Area”), and Collingwood.

The Province is promising that the Fall will bring third reading to the Barrie/Innisfil Boundary Act, as well as the implementation of policies that will entrench the population figures set out in the Vision paper and new strengthened policies to protect and promote the strong recreational, natural heritage and agriculture framework of the County. Stay tuned.

For information or advice on municipal matters, contact

Marshall Green at 705-737-1811 ext. 224 or

emg@gwg.on.ca